|
|
Nonprofit Tax ComplianceCalifornia CPA magazine: August 2008IRS Raises the Governance Bar with the Revised Form 990 The IRS has raised the governance bar for public charities. It has issued a revised Form 990, the annual information return filed by most nonprofits based on the premise that good governance produces better tax compliance (see Sidebar 1). The form includes an entirely new governance part, which, in effect, increases scrutiny of the management policies and practices of nonprofit organizations in matters directly and indirectly related to the organization’s tax law compliance. Careful responses to the substantial issues raised by these new governance questions will require advance review and planning by the charity, its CPAs and legal advisers. The revised Form 990 will be effective for tax years beginning after January 1, 2008. Now is the time to encourage your nonprofit clients to review their organizations’ policies so that they are fully prepared to demonstrate compliance with both tax laws and “best practices” of nonprofit governance. IRS Form 990 Revision More than 700 public comments (3,000 pages) were filed in response to the proposed revisions, prompting the IRS to make additional changes. The final version was published December 20, 2007, and draft instructions were published for comment on April 7, 2008. The IRS expects to finalize the instructions by the end of the year. The revised Form 990 expands the “core” form from nine to 11 pages, and increases the number of potential schedules to 15. Organizations will determine which schedules they need to file by completing a new, 37-question checklist. The revised core form, schedules, draft instructions and IRS background explanations can be found on the IRS’ website (see Sidebar 2). An entirely new part entitled, “Governance, Management and Disclosure” (GMD) is particularly important to nonprofit directors, officers and managers. It seeks information on governance and management, the process for determining executive compensation, policies regarding conflicts of interest, whistleblower encouragement and protection, document retention, and public disclosure of tax returns and other governance and financial information. Opponents of GMD argued that the information it sought is not required by law, and that the inclusion of questions on such topics might make them de facto legal requirements. Although the IRS admitted that much of the requested information was not required, it insisted “the existence of an independent governing body and well-defined governance and management policies and practices increases the likelihood that an organization is operating in compliance with federal tax law.” For example, Line 10 asks whether a copy of Form 990 was provided to the directors before filing with the IRS. The form’s follow-up question underscores the point: it requires a description of the process by which directors, officers or other management, if any, reviewed the Form 990, including by whom and when the review was conducted, and the extent of the review. Both the IRS and the nonprofit’s funding sources seek assurances that the directors are properly supervising tax law compliance. Key Governance Questions A. Governing Body and Management • Got Minutes? On the surface, the question simply reflects good management practice (recording board meeting minutes) to keep timely, accurate, records of actions taken by board and board committees. However, a negative response potentially precludes reliance upon the executive compensation “safe harbor” provisions of federal “excess benefit” prohibitions which, inter alia, require contemporaneous recording of the board’s deliberations and decision (Treas. Reg. Sec. 53.4958-6). B. Policies • Joint Ventures Policy. The new form asks, with little subtlety (raising the specter of loss of exemption), “[H]as the organization adopted a written policy or procedure requiring the organization to evaluate its participation in joint venture arrangements under applicable Federal tax law, and taken steps to safeguard the organization’s exempt status with respect to such arrangements?” Some suggested safeguards identified in the instructions include control over the venture to ensure it furthers the exempt purpose of the organization and gives priority to the exempt purpose over profits for other participants. C. Disclosures Conclusion Sidebar Marty Trupiano owns and operates the Law Offices of Martin J. Trupiano. He can be reached at (818) 783-5151.
|
